Questions:
1. What did you learn about your own project by comparing drafts of the same project in different genres?
Something I learned by looking at both a QRG and a standard college essay is that I think I need to add more of my own personality into my draft, I think I just stated facts too often, but I will have to go back and see.
2. Top three issues or problems with your draft?
One issue is definitely formatting, I still need to go add more color to make it more appealing to the eye at first site.
The second issue is content. I need to add more about my stakeholders that were part of/at the event into my draft rather than just the event specifically.
The last thing is organization. I feel as though I need to rearrange where I put what facts/ideas so it flows better together and is easier to read.
3. Top three strengths of your draft?
One strength is my content. Besides the stakeholders, I feel as though I have a lot of very strong factual and interesting information.
Another strength is I feel as though I represented both sides of my controversy as well with some of my subheadings within my QRG.
The final strength is my pictures. I found some great pictures that relate to my controversy that easily illustrate what I am trying to talk about.
Now that I have learned more about my QRG and received some feedback from my peers it's time to get to revising. Hence the picture below.
 |
| Gerd Altman "Display Panel, Timeline, Ad, Saying" September 2014 via pixabay. Public domain dedication |
No comments:
Post a Comment